<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [rrd-users] Rrdtool 1.3.5</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Courier New"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'>Hi Tobias , I switched from 1.3.5 to 1.2.29 and it took me 5 seconds to generate 28 graphs when I used 1.2.29. Otherwise it would take me 30seconds to generate these graphs when 1.3.5 used and I noticed high CPU during the rrdtool_graph ran.<BR>
<BR>
I m using red-hat release 4 and I didn’t change anything by the version of rrdtool.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks<BR>
<BR>
Jeffrey<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 12/20/08 3:04 PM, "Tobias Oetiker" <<a href="tobi@oetiker.ch">tobi@oetiker.ch</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Courier New"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:9pt'>Hi Jeffrey,<BR>
<BR>
Yesterday Jeffrey (Xiu Yan) Zhang wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Hi<BR>
><BR>
> I found that the new version 1.3.5 compiled on red-hat is 5x slower than 1.2.x when rrd_graph runs.<BR>
> what is your experience?<BR>
> thanks<BR>
<BR>
there were issues with the pango code until 1.3.2 or so ... this<BR>
should be fixed now ... performacne should be on par to 1.2 as soon<BR>
as you create more than a single graph<BR>
<BR>
cheers<BR>
tobi<BR>
<BR>
> Jeffrey<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland<BR>
<a href="http://it.oetiker.ch">http://it.oetiker.ch</a> <a href="tobi@oetiker.ch">tobi@oetiker.ch</a> ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>