Hi<br><br>look for hping probe :<br><br><a href="http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/p/HPing.pm">http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/p/HPing.pm</a><br><br>I used and work very well for your requirements...<br><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
2007/12/13, tbh <<a href="mailto:tbh1000@gmail.com">tbh1000@gmail.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 12/13/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer <
<a href="mailto:bortzmeyer@nic.fr">bortzmeyer@nic.fr</a>> wrote:<br>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:59:37AM -0600,<br>> tbh <<a href="mailto:tbh1000@gmail.com">tbh1000@gmail.com</a>> wrote<br>> a message of 67 lines which said:
<br>><br>> > it appeared to me the EchoPing primarily is used to measure HTTP<br>> > requests. It does have options for SSL and SMTP,<br>><br>> or echo, discard or chargen :-)<br><br>True...true...:-)
<br><br>><br>> > but I'm looking to measure latency to other ports as well (ie., FTP,<br>> > Telnet, SSH, etc).<br>><br>> Not done yet, although the new plugin architecture should make it easy<br>
> (I'm not sure I will include telnet support, is there any reason to<br>> still use telnet today???)<br>><br><br>Not really, I just threw it in as an example.<br><br>> But, if you are interested only in TCP latency, any port will work,
<br>> no? I do not think there exists an OS which replies to connection on<br>> port 80 faster or slower than on other ports.<br>><br><br>My issue is that not all the hosts I'm measuring to are running a web server.
<br><br>Thanks for the responses!<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>smokeping-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:smokeping-users@lists.oetiker.ch">smokeping-users@lists.oetiker.ch</a><br><a href="https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users">
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>