[mrtg] Re: CMU SNMP and Redhat 6.2
Daniel R . Kilbourne
drk at voyager.net
Tue Oct 10 17:57:31 MEST 2000
here you go......this is what I use for our stuff...
# First, map the community name (COMMUNITY) into a security name
# (local and mynetwork, depending on where the request is coming
# from):
# sec.name source community
com2sec local ip.address.of.poller string
com2sec local2 ip.address.of.2ndpoller string
####
# Second, map the security names into group names:
# sec.model sec.name
group MyROGroup v1 local
group MyROGroup v2c local
group MyROGroup usm local
group MyROGroup v1 local2
group MyROGroup v2c local2
group MyROGroup usm local2
####
# Third, create a view for us to let the groups have rights to:
# incl/excl subtree mask
view all included .1 80
####
# Finally, grant the 2 groups access to the 1 view with different
# write permissions:
# context sec.model sec.level match read write notif
access MyROGroup "" any noauth exact all none none
access MyRWGroup "" any noauth exact all all none
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
syslocation Right here, right now.
syscontact Me <me at somewhere.org>
proc mountd
proc ntalkd 4
proc sendmail 10 1
exec echotest /bin/echo hello world
disk / 10000
load 12 14 14
this will allow polling acces from ip.address.of.poller and ip.address.of.2ndpoller only using 'string' for read-only access
HTH
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 10:46:03PM -0600, Nicholas Ritter spake:
>
> I can't get UCD to answer a query from an external system. A config file
> would be helpful, porvided that it is for UCD-SNMP, not CMU.
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel R . Kilbourne" <drk at voyager.net>
> To: "Nicholas Ritter" <ritter at LFMAIL.LFC.EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 8:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [mrtg] CMU SNMP and Redhat 6.2
>
>
> > what problems are you having setting it up? If you need a sample
> snmpd.conf file, I can provide you with one. I find ucd-snmp to be great for
> what is needed......
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:11:14PM -0600, Nicholas Ritter spake:
> > >
> > > I am going to go back to trying to get UCD working. UCD seems like a
> more powerful system anyway. It is obvious to me, per the config file notes,
> that UCD is setup to be very restrictive for the protection of the system.
> This is great, but that doesn't change anything. It is still hard to setup,
> and doesn't have the best docs.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Daniel R. Kilbourne
> > daniel.kilbourne at voyager.net
> > Voyager.net Network Engineer
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
> Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
> FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
> WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
>
--
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Daniel R. Kilbourne
daniel.kilbourne at voyager.net
Voyager.net Network Engineer
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list