[mrtg] Re: MRTG problem for OC3

[Jim Hunt]

I am curious how to modify the poll frequency to quicker than 5 minutes.  (I
am running windows NT.)  What other considerations should someone, like
myself, know before they monitor OC3 or OC12 ATM links with MRTG?

Jim Hunt, MCSE 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Lim Choon Keat - CSSG
To: tony bourke
Cc: Carmen Chow; mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
Sent: 10/27/00 10:54 PM
Subject: [mrtg] Re: MRTG problem for OC3


Tony, 

is that mean that everything 
will be fine
once i change the mib file
from 32 bit counter to 64 bit counter ?

THANKS & REGARDS
==============================================
ERIC LIM CHOON KEAT

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, tony bourke wrote:

Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:38:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: tony bourke <tony at vegan.net>
To: Carmen Chow <carmenc at cwhkt.net>
Cc: mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
Subject: [mrtg] Re: MRTG problem for OC3


I know this has been mentioned before, but here is the math to show why
MRTG or any SNMP program at 5 minute intervals cannot measure more than
114 Mbps of data:

One limitation to keep in mind is that the default configuration file
generated by MRTG cannot accurately measure bandwidth above about 114
Mbps
(Megabits per second). The reason is that the default interface counter
is
a 32-bit number, and a 32-bit number will rollover twice in a period of
5
minutes at more than 114 Mbps. (232 = 4,294,967,296 bytes, multiplied by
8
(bits in a byte), divided by 300 seconds in 5 minutes, is 114,532,641
bits
per second, or roughly 114 Mbps.) MRTG or any other SNMP program cannot
correctly account for a double rollover. The graph will appear to peak
at
about 114 Mbps and never go beyond that, when in reality the interface
could be running well beyond that rate. To get around this, you must
change the configuration file to pole a special 64-bit interface
counter,
or poll MRTG more frequently than 5 minutes.


Tony


On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Carmen Chow wrote:

> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I try to perform MRTG for a OC3 (POS intf).  The graphs is nice when
the
> traffic is below 100M.  However, it never growth over 120M even I've
> modified the interval to 2 mins.
> 
> The peak of the graph drop back to 20-30M once the peak is over 120M.
> Did anyone have encountered this problem and pls give me some hints to
> solve it.  Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Carmen Chow
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
> Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
> FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
> WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
> 

-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - -  -  -- -  -  -  -   -     -
Tony Bourke				tony at vegan.net



--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi



--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi