[mrtg] Re: Spikes in MRTG graphs and logs...

[Schuyler Bishop]

All,

Note that I think I might have pinned down the difference.  It seems that
with the new version of the config, I'm using IP addresses as the identifier
in MRTG, while in the old version I was using interface numbering.  I've
verified that interface numbering still produces spikes, even with the new
version of MRTG.  Again, this seems to be related to using interface
numbering instead of IP address numbering in cfgmaker.  Excerpt from the two
similar cfgmaker lines:

New with Interface numbering: (spikes still happen)
./cfgmaker --ifref=nr --ifdesc=alias --subdirs=HOSTNAME --community=public
--output=../cfgs/test1.cfg --global
workdir:/usr/local/apache/htdocs/mrtg/test --global 'options[_]:
growright,bits'

New with IP address numbering: (spikes don't happen)
./cfgmaker --ifref=ip --ifdesc=alias --subdirs=HOSTNAME --community=public
--output=../cfgs/test.cfg --global
workdir:/usr/local/apache/htdocs/mrtg/test --global 'options[_]:
growright,bits' 


Schuyler

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex van den Bogaerdt [mailto:alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 6:42 PM
To: SBishop at e-xpedient.com
Cc: mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
Subject: [mrtg] Re: Spikes in MRTG graphs and logs...



Schuyler Bishop wrote:
> 
> Per request, here are the relevant codes with appropriate removals of
> private info.  :)  Note that the IPs have been changed to protect the
> innocent.

Sure.  I even removed more and see just one real difference.  The
option line looks different but isn't (in this case). All other
lines were just textual differences (if at all different).

> Old config: (2.8.12)
> Target[10.10.10.10.6]: 6:public at 10.10.10.10

> New Config: (2.9.12a)
> Target[10.10.10.10_10.20.10.10]: /10.20.10.10:public at 10.10.10.10:

What should happen is that MRTG browses the MIB for an interface
with this IP address, and use the aquired interface number to get
the statistics.

The question that comes to mind right away:  Is the interface number
for the interface with IP address 10.20.10.10 indeed 6 at the moment,
in other words: could it have changed over time (due to a reboot or so).

Even if the traffic looks more or less the same, it may be that you
are monitoring a different interface ?

-- 
   __________________________________________________________________
 / alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl                  alex at ergens.op.het.net \
| work                                                         private |
| My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | 
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://faq.mrtg.org/                                                 |
| http://rrdtool.eu.org  --> tutorial                                  |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+

--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi