[mrtg] Re: MRTG oddities continued
Williams, Garth
gkwilliams at epcor.ca
Tue Feb 5 00:16:55 MET 2002
Thanks Paul.
I um <sheepish grin> deleted the original messages. Sorry.
It is just that I have found that when it appears that MRTG has suddenly
changed the way it works, it is usually because I overlooked an option
setting or something as simple as MaxBytes.
As Molt would say in A Bug's Life...
"Shutting up!"
g
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paul [SMTP:pkdb1 at attbi.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Williams, Garth
> Cc: mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [mrtg] Re: MRTG oddities continued
>
> maybe read the original post and see what an SNMPGET returns in
> both cases and what gets logged in both cases. They are different
> targets: so yes, the values should not be the same. But given
> values A B C D and 1 2 3 4, I expect values A B C D and values 1 2
> 3 4 to be logged, not A B C D, and 1 0 2 0.
>
> Does that help?
>
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list