[mrtg] Re: MRTG oddities continued

Williams, Garth gkwilliams at epcor.ca
Tue Feb 5 00:16:55 MET 2002

Thanks Paul.

I um  <sheepish grin> deleted the original messages.  Sorry. 

It is just that I have found that when it appears that MRTG has suddenly
changed the way it works, it is usually because I overlooked an option
setting or something as simple as MaxBytes.

As Molt would say in A Bug's Life... 

"Shutting up!"


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	paul [SMTP:pkdb1 at attbi.com]
> Sent:	Monday, February 04, 2002 4:10 PM
> To:	Williams, Garth
> Cc:	mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
> Subject:	Re: [mrtg] Re: MRTG oddities continued
> maybe read the original post and see what an SNMPGET returns in 
> both cases and what gets logged in both cases. They are different 
> targets: so yes, the values should not be the same. But given 
> values A B C D and 1 2 3 4, I expect values A B C D and values 1 2 
> 3 4 to be logged, not A B C D, and 1 0 2 0.
> Does that help? 

Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

More information about the mrtg mailing list