[mrtg] Re: Counter Overflow

[Steve Godfrey]

I seem to recall V1 can handle up to 130 Mbps and the graph will top out so you do need to use V2. Saying that I've not had much joy using V2!



>>> <Barry_Young at interliant.com> 02/19/02 06:17pm >>>

Basic question to end a long day with....

We have just started monitoring gigabit fibre interfaces on Cisco switches
using standard SNMPV1.  As this is a heavily used uplink for a dedicated
backup server it is used excessively, do I need to worry about interface
counters wrapping and being reset?  I assume there is a finite counter
limit that will be reached?  Would it be preferable to use SNMPV2c or am I
going down the wrong track?

Is it easy to verify if a device supports the ifHC* counters under SNMPV2c.

Thanks in advance
__________________________________________________________
This message contains information intended only for named recipients.
If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your
system and notify the sender immediately by e-mail.
Information transmission via email cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free. The sender does not accept liability for errors or omissions in
the contents of this message arising as a result of e-mail transmission
problems.


--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe 
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg 
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org 
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi 



--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi