[mrtg] Re: Best Practice 1 mrtg process or multiple

[tony bourke]

Hi Bill,

I've had good results in similar situations by runnign multiple config
files, spread out over the 5 minute intervals.  (Some starting at 0,
others starting at 2, etc).

As always, SCSI works better than IDE, especially for MRTG's somewhat I/O
intensive-ness with high number of targets.

Tony

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Bill Carter wrote:

> I am knew to this.
>
> I am monitoring a Cisco Cat 5500 switch and 2 Cisco 7200 routers with 40+
> subinterfaces each.
>
> Is it better for me to run 1 mrtg process for each of these devices or
> should I combine the cfg files to make it 1 big process?
>
>
>
>
> -- Attached file removed by Listar and put at URL below --
> -- Type: application/ms-tnef
> -- Size: 1k (1496 bytes)
> -- URL : http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/pantomime/80-winmail.dat
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
> Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
> FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
> WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
>

-- 
-------------- -- ---- ---- --- - - - -  -  -- -  -  -  -   -     -
Tony Bourke				tony at vegan.net




--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi