[mrtg] Re: 14all vs mrtg-rrd vs routers.cgi

[Woodcock, Bradford]

Good points all around Daniel. We are using 14all but that isn't to say
the others don't meet many needs. And we have a topology based graphical
front end for slick navigation with infraMon.

Cheers,
Woody...

http://www.inframon.org - infraMon: Network Infrastructure Monitor
http://www.micro-mess.com/forum/ - infraMon Questions/Discussions
 

-----Original Message-----
From: mrtg-bounce at list.ee.ethz.ch [mailto:mrtg-bounce at list.ee.ethz.ch]
On Behalf Of Daniel J McDonald
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Phil Iovino
Cc: mrtg
Subject: [mrtg] Re: 14all vs mrtg-rrd vs routers.cgi

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 20:06, Phil Iovino wrote:
> Any advice on which to use? The colors of the graphs, overall look,
and
> configurability is very important for us.

I use routers2.cgi because it has a very nice, browsable interface to
find things.

I use rrd_mrtg.cgi because it doesn't require ? in the url, so it works
well with Big Brother, but navigation is a pain.

I used 14all.cgi to learn a lot of perl tricks, particularly with the
mrtg_lib.pm module, which hasn't always been as documented as currently,
so seeing a great example of it in use in 14all.cgi was a big help to my
own mrtg extensions.


-- 
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE 2495, CNX
Austin Energy

--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi