[mrtg] Re: Missing values on poll/write.
nistor at snickers.org
Tue Jan 27 05:30:10 MET 2004
Appears I have overlooked the obvious, how silly of me.
Thanks =) Odly enough it was the only port that was set to maxbytes of
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
||On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Jon Nistor wrote:
||> Its a new port thats never been used before so the counters were 0.
||> Plugged the cable into it and moved the pointer over to that port, thought
||> it was fine then got up in the morning and realize it was only logging 1
||> value, outgoing.
||> This is a snipit from the rrd file (from more testing):
||[snip lines showing NaN as ifInOctet rates]
||> IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.58 = Counter64: 944515405259
||> IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.58 = Counter64: 944534971874
||> IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.58 = Counter64: 944558847014
||> IF-MIB::ifHCInOctets.58 = Counter64: 944583105612
||Increase roughly 20,000,000 in 10 seconds, that's 2 MBps or 16 Mbps.
||Check that you didn't set MaxBytes to, for instance, 1.25 M.
||This message was produced without any <iframe tags
||Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
||FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
Jon (nistor at snickers.org) - iioiiooo.oiiiiiio.oioiioio.ooooooio
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
More information about the mrtg