[mrtg] Re: Cisco Switch: Interfaces don't add up right
Eric Brander
eric_mailing_list at rednarb.com
Thu Apr 7 15:55:32 MEST 2005
Steve WOODIN wrote:
>>>>Shane Presley <shane.presley at gmail.com> 4/7/2005 9:46:17 AM >>>
>>>>
>>>>
>When we fire off our backups at midnight, we see lots of ports max out
>(95% utilization or about 11MB/s). They all are sending data to our
>uplink port (media server). But what's odd is the gigabit uplink port
>only shows 10% utilization (11MB/s).
>
~snip~
>
>Umm, because it's a switch and not a hub? Remember the way switching
>technology operates. It tries to preserve the bandwidth and keep each
>connection "private" and not share it like a hub would. Therefore you do
>not "add up" the total data going in, because the switch, if at all
>possible, is going to try to preserve the speed for each connection.
>
>So in your case:
>
>Server 1 - Media Server = 11Mbps
>Server 2 - Media Server = 11Mbps
>Etc.
>
>
>
~snip~
He said 11 MB/s MegaBytes per Second. Your example is in bits and
doesn't quite apply. I ~think~ the answer to his question is in the
32-bit counter wrap problem. I forget the exact number but at somewhere
north of 109 megabits per second, the 32-bit counter will wrap twice
within a 5-minute period, giving inacurate results.
Try :::::2 at the end of your target string as per the reference.html
and see if your gig interfaces support 64-bit counters.
HTH,
Eric Brander
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list