[mrtg] Latency Graphs
s.shipway at auckland.ac.nz
Thu May 20 22:47:35 CEST 2010
In my opinion, Smokeping is better if you're specifically interested in latency times; it gives more data and in a better way because it is focussed solely on latency times.
However, if you want a couple of latency times as an addition to your many MRTG graphs, stick with the MRTG+mrtg-ping-probe method; that way you'll get everything in the same interface.
We use the mrtg-ping-probe for core stats; however we also have smokeping installed for the network team to do deeper analysis. So, you can use both. If you're using routers2 as your frontend to MRTG/RRD, then you can use the routers.cgi*Extension extended directive to link to the Smokeping pages for a device and embed them within the routers2 interface, and get the best of both worlds.
From: mrtg-bounces+s.shipway=auckland.ac.nz at lists.oetiker.ch [mrtg-bounces+s.shipway=auckland.ac.nz at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Christopher Noyes [cnoyes at csc.com]
Sent: Friday, 21 May 2010 2:13 a.m.
To: Scott Ocken
Cc: mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch; mrtg-bounces+cnoyes=csc.com at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Latency Graphs
How does Smokeping compare versus MRTG+mrtg-ping-probe+RRDtool ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the mrtg