[mrtg] Issue with MRTG and explicit OIDs

[Peter Dolkens]

Hi Steve,

  Just tried your suggestions and no luck.

Target[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]:
1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:ddrit at piper.ddrit.com:
::::2
MaxBytes[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 2879620294
Title[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: [piper.ddrit.com]: Disk Usage
Kilo[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: 1024
Unscaled[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: ymwd
ShortLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: B
YLegend[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization
Legend1[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load)
Legend2[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: Disk Utilization in % (Load)
Legend3[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]:
Legend4[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]:
LegendI[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]:  Disk Utilization
LegendO[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]:
Options[piper.ddrit.com_TEST]: gauge, integer, transparent, noborder,
nobanner, nolegend, growright

And in the log:
1342940452 21985147 *732136646 *21985147 *732136646*

The number in red should be 2879620294

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Steve Shipway <s.shipway at auckland.ac.nz>wrote:

>  Are you using 'option[]: gauge' (you probably should be)?
> Can you use SNMPv2 (with these large numbers best to do this)?
>
> Steve
>
>  *Steve Shipway*
> University of Auckland ITS
> *UNIX Systems Design Lead*
> s.shipway at auckland.ac.nz
> Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487
> **
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* mrtg-bounces+s.shipway=auckland.ac.nz at lists.oetiker.ch[mrtg-bounces+s.shipway=
> auckland.ac.nz at lists.oetiker.ch] on behalf of Peter Dolkens [
> peter.dolkens at ddrit.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, 22 July 2012 6:19 p.m.
> *To:* mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
> *Subject:* [mrtg] Issue with MRTG and explicit OIDs
>
>  Hi all,
>
>    I'm trying to set up some disk monitoring on my Synology NAS, using
> MRTG (windows).
>
>    The Target I'm using is:
> Target[piper.ddrit.com_DISK]:
> 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.6.33&1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.3.1.5.33:public at piper.ddrit.com
>
>    If I query either of these values via the command line, I get a
> correct result.
>   If I query either of these values individually in MRTG, I get a correct
> result.
>   If I use the line above, then the 2nd value has 2147483648 subtracted
> from the collected values.
>
>    Does anyone know why it's doing this, or how to fix it?
>
>    It's annoying because I'm intending to expand my NAS, and using this
> counter, I could theoretically display relative capacity usage
> (displayrelpercent) but right now MRTG can't seem to collect the 2nd
> counter properly, which is putting a damper on things.
>
>    Thanks,
> Pete
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20120722/1c18ca44/attachment.htm