> 
> Target[all.transit]: 4:comm@router + 5:comm@router + 4:comm@router2 + 5:comm@router2 + 21:comm@router3 + 22:comm@router3 + 23:comm@router3
> MaxBytes[all.transit]: 50576000
>
[...]
> 
> The produced data and graph are extremely inconsistant (it's not "wavey"
> like it should be) and does not corrilate to the graphs of each individual
> interface. (The above might produce 30mb, when all of the other graphs
> total 100mb, for instance.)

IIRC there has been a similar post some months ago. It turned out to be
very possible that there is a counter overflow happening.
I'm not sure if there actually was one, but it may be worthwile to check.

Try to find out where things go wrong, it will be at the higher numbers.
You could, for instance, create a script that adds up the values on the
first line of each logfile and compare that to your 'total' logfile.

Perhaps you would like to try rrdtool, in combination with the recently
created patch to mrtg that allowes you to use rrdtool.
The calculation for total can then be made without any snmp requests.

Regards,
Alex

--
* To unsubscribe from the mrtg mailing list, send a message with the
  subject: unsubscribe to mrtg-request@list.ee.ethz.ch
* The mailing list archive is at http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg