<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [mrtg] MRTG/RRDTOOL integration</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText53867 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>how about 14all.cgi</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> mrtg-bounces@lists.oetiker.ch on behalf of Niall O'Reilly<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 1/29/2008 6:21 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Xavier Beaudouin<BR><B>Cc:</B> mrtg@lists.oetiker.ch<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [mrtg] MRTG/RRDTOOL integration<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><BR>
<P><FONT size=2>On 29 Jan 2008, at 18:54, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:<BR><BR>> About mrtg+rrd frontend did you try routers2 ?<A href="http:///">http://</A><BR>> www.steveshipway.org/software/<BR><BR> Of course! It's one of the three mentioned, and it's very impressive.<BR><BR> AFAICS, routers2 is so well integrated that it doesn't expose the<BR> display components I need in order to migrate to rrdtool while avoiding<BR> noticeable change to the look, feel, and navigational properties of<BR> our existing MRTG installation. This has over 100 instances of MRTG,<BR> distributed over more than a dozen servers, redundantly monitoring<BR> some 4- or 5-thousand distinct targets, and is displayed as a single<BR> document hierarchy.<BR><BR> I'ld be glad to learn otherwise, but I think routers2 isn't primitive<BR> enough. 8-)<BR><BR> Thanks for taking the trouble to answer. I appreciate it.<BR><BR> /Niall<BR><BR><BR>*** eSafe scanned this email for malicious content ***<BR>*** IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders ***</FONT> </P></DIV></BODY></HTML>