[rrd-developers] Re: rrd format change ?
karl_schilke at eli.net
Thu Mar 15 20:14:41 MET 2001
This sounds like a great idea to me. I bet we could regain that lost
efficiency (and more) by using mmap(2) instead of stdio for the actual
access to the RRD data.
Tobi and I also discussed creating a "native" and "portable" (xml?) data
format for RRD data files. I think this is a good idea, but far outside
I'd be willing to step up to doing the stdio -> mmap(2) conversion once
the new format(s) have been decided.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jake Brutlag wrote:
> Once implemented, these accessor functions could be even exposed through
> the Perl interface, which would provide better, but controlled, access
> for client programs to the header information. Of course, the downside
> of this approach is a slight loss of efficiency.
O----O The Terminator rAT -+- karl_schilke at eli.net -+- (360)816-3837
\Oo/ Network Management Systems && Applications -- Electric Lightwave
==\/== "Some days I just pray for spontaneous combustion." -Dan Di Paolo
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the rrd-developers