[rrd-developers] Re: Consolidation Factors and Steps

[Jake Brutlag]

> Today Gellatly, Laurie wrote:
> 
>  | So a change to rrd_fetch.c of:
>  | 168c168,169
>  | <       if(cf_conv(rrd.rra_def[i].cf_nam) == cf_idx){
>  | ---
>  | >       if((cf_conv(rrd.rra_def[i].cf_nam) == cf_idx) ||
>  | >                    (rrd.rra_def[i].pdp_cnt == 1)){
>  | (the line numbers may be wrong due to the older version 
> I'm running)
>  | would be a reasonable change?
> 
> with the current crop of consolidation functons this is a save bet
> ...

But for 1.1.x the consolidation functions for aberrant behavior
detection will break
this code (i.e. they have the 1 PDP/CDP), so this should NOT be part of
1.1.x.

Jake

Jake Brutlag
Network Analyst
Microsoft WebTV 

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi