[rrd-developers] Re: Problem with time
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl
Sun Feb 3 23:26:45 MET 2002
Pavel Mores wrote:
> I tried to follow the formal time syntax specification (in parsetime.c)
> while making my changes.
>
> Excuse me, but is "yyyymmdd hh:mm" supposed to be a valid
> TIME-SPECIFICATION? Generally, if we don't use offset TIME-SPECIFICATION
> is basically TIME-REFERENCE. Roughly speaking, TIME-REFERENCE is a
> TIME-OF-DAY-SPEC followed by either of the DAY-SPEC flavors. So it
> seems to me that the correct syntax should really be "hh:mm yyyymmdd"
> but then again, I might be wrong.
This format does indeed seem to be an exception. It is however
specified as, and I quote, "not quote standard, but I love this ..."
in the documentation.
It has been around a long time and it has the advantage that
it is an auto-sorting time specification.
I would really regret to see it go away, but if I'm alone ...
cheers,
--
__________________________________________________________________
/ alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl alex at ergens.op.het.net \
| work private |
| My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://faq.mrtg.org/ |
| http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-developers
mailing list