[rrd-developers] Re: (bug?) Incorrectly selecting low-res RRA

[Alex van den Bogaerdt]

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 06:20:47AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:

> > > 1048340160: 1.7460317460e-02
> > > 1048350240: 6.4484126984e-03
> > > 1048360320: 5.5555555556e-03
> > > 1048370400: 5.5555555556e-03
> > > 1048380480: 3.3531746032e-02
> > > 1048390560: nan
> 
> are you sure this output is correct? The timestamps show 
> the step of 80 seconds, while the RRD step is 15 seconds. 

Nope.  It is 10080 seconds which is 15*672

This number is found using rrdtool info: rra[3].pdp_per_row = 672

cheers,
Alex
-- 
Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offence. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.

http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi