[rrd-developers] implementing portable format

[Sebastian Harl]

Hi Kevin,

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 08:44:40PM -0600, kevin brintnall wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 12:42:13PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > (Disclaimer: I did not really follow that, so I might repeat stuff or
> > just talk plain bullshit - if so, please tell me ;-))
> 
> Check my previous email on the thread and let me know if you still have
> questions about the BATCH protocol.  The current implementation is
> documented in rrdcached.pod.
[...]

Well, I don't really have any questions about the current implemen-
tation. I was just going to bring up a few ideas about how to get a
correct status even when using the BATCH mode but I did not know what
has been discussed on that topic so far.

So, did you look at my suggestions? What do you think about that? I know
that this would require a change of the protocol but the current imple-
mentation has not yet been released, so it's still time to change it if
required / wanted.

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20081103/f8db2c74/attachment.bin