[rrd-developers] [PATCH] add 'flush' to language bindings

[Sebastian Harl]

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:15:02PM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> yes dropping rrd_flush from the api is not a good idea, otoh it
> does not acomplish anything sensible in the code, so I propose the
> following:
> 
> have rrdc_flush for the client flushing function
> and turn rrd_flush into a no-op for backward compatibility

I really hope, I do not sound too picky, but this would change the
semantics of rrd_flush() which would be a backward incompatible change
to the ABI as well (thus requiring a major soname version bump).

Please note though, that removing the call to rrd_flush() in the holt-
winter stuff is perfectly valid (as long as it does not break anything,
of course ;-)).

Cheers,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20090328/78daff8f/attachment-0001.bin