[rrd-developers] RFC: [PATCH] Portability by avoiding PATH_MAX

[Svante Signell]

On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 19:34 +0200, Tobias Oetiker wrote:
> Hi Svante,
> 
> cool ... have you seen that there is now the beginning of a
> test-suite in the HEAD branch of on github ?

Hi Tobi,

I did run tests/alltest and tests/tune1,tune2. All tests were OK.
Anything else to try to find out if the patches are OK? Anything I can
apply with valgrind, the tests are all shell scripts. Of course set -x
etc, will work.

Attached are four Debian patches from the latest built version 1.4.8-1.
They apply to the latest git too. Maybe they are of interest to apply
upstream too?

Thanks,
Svante
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: implicit-decl-fix
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 222 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20140501/bb075e64/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no-rpath-for-perl
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1028 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20140501/bb075e64/attachment-0001.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no-rpath-for-ruby
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 426 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20140501/bb075e64/attachment-0002.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: setup.py-module-name
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 515 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-developers/attachments/20140501/bb075e64/attachment-0003.bin