[rrd-users] Re: Setting upper and lower boundaries on graphs
Nicholas Tang
ntang at mail.communityconnect.com
Wed Dec 5 17:19:10 MET 2001
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
> You've just made the upper-limit rigid. You also want a rigid
> lower-limit (set to 0).
>
> I think that's all there is to it.
Hmmm. That worked... but I thought it wouldn't.
According to the docs:
-l|--lower-limit value (default autoconfigure)
This is not the lower limit of a graph. But rather, this is the maximum
lower bound of a graph. For example, the value -100 will result in a graph
that has a lower limit of -100 or less. Use this keyword to expand graphs
down.
Am I misinterpreting that? It sounds to me that is supposed to be used
when you're graphing a negative graph and want it to go from 0 to -x
rather than 0 to +x.
That confused me. Oh well. It's working now - thanks.
Nicholas
--
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list