[rrd-users] Re: Graphing Very Small Numbers
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl
Fri Jan 25 00:49:18 MET 2002
Cliff wrote:
> But I have to multiply by at least 100K in my mrtg configs.
> I assume this is because the 5-minute average that mrtg does
> by default produces an amount that is less than 1, which MRTG
> ignores because it's not a whole number.
Almost right. MRTG doesn't ignore small numbers, it truncates
numbers to integers. 0.00001 isn't ignored, it is truncated to 0.
> So will RRDTool do a better job of graphing small numbers?
It will.
<checking source>
It can do atobytes if you wish (that's 10^-18).
> Or how are other folks graphing numbers that 5-minute-average out to be
> less than 1?
I have graphed such a counter as a percentage of a declared maximum
allowed number. If you think 10 errors per 300 seconds is the limit,
10 should be equal to 100% and thus each error should be 10% This
comes down to multiplying the counter with 3000. If you get one
error in an interval, mrtg will calculate 3000/300 == 10.
It is probably best to use unscaled[] for these kind of images.
HTH
--
__________________________________________________________________
/ alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl alex at ergens.op.het.net \
| work private |
| My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://faq.mrtg.org/ |
| http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list