[rrd-users] Summing up again
Matthias Mikuletz
mmi at ilpoe.uni-stuttgart.de
Fri May 17 11:23:44 MEST 2002
Hi again,
as I understood the answer of Tobi, he is not quite willing to have such
an additional consolidation function added. Probably because keeping the
update function small and efficient is a main point.
OK, fair enough.
But then a perfect solution would be to have the possibility to use a
variable in CDEF's that represents the number of consolidated points in an
RRA, BUT DIFFERENT FOR EVERY RRA IN THE RRD, because the whole problem
arises since an 'rrdtool graph .... CDEF..' command applies to all the RRA
in the RRD.
You could then call 'rrdtool graph' with one CDEF that says 'multiply
data_source (which is AVERAGE CF'ed in the RRA's ) by steps_rra (which is
the steps value of the RRA's RESPECTIVELY).
Wouldn't this be great!
Tobi, would it be a problem to have something like this being implemented?
I cannot determine how complex this would be.
Thanks and greetings from sunny Stuttgart
Matthias
--
===================================================================
== from: Matthias Mikuletz ==
== ILpÖ -- Universität Stuttgart ==
== jobfon 0711/121-4142 email mmi at ilpoe.uni-stuttgart.de ==
===================================================================
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list