[rrd-users] Re: MRTG performance

[Hugo van der Kooij]

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tobias Oetiker wrote:

> Today Pavel Ruzicka wrote:
>
> > I use MRTG for measuring about 150 routers and switches and about 7000
> > targets. When some device is dead, I have holes in graphs.
> > I have some optimizations - 20 forks, shorter SNMP timeouts, but this is not
> > enough.
> > It's possible to have some deadhost detection?
>
> well mrtg does detect dead hosts, it sends only one request and
> then disables th host until the next round ...

Am I correct in assumeing this only applies if those 200 ports are listed
in a single config file for that node? So if you split this in 4 config
files of 50 ports you would have 1 timeout per config file.

Hugo.

-- 
 All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
    hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org		http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
	    Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
	    for they are subtle and quick to anger.

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi