[rrd-users] Re: BUG: start=-6m vs. start=-180d

Per Jessen per at computer.org
Mon Mar 14 21:29:55 MET 2005

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:03:37 +0100 (CET), Hakan Lindholm wrote:

>>>> Hi,
>>>> I've just this morning come across the following:
>>>> 1) running rrdtool graph with "--start=-6m" produces :
>>>> SANITY CHECK: 4294965856 rows cannot be reduced by 1440 BUG in reduce_data()
>>>> 2) running rrdtool graph with anywhere from "--start=-180d" to "--start=-190d" works fine.
>>>> I have a copy of the database if that helps.
>Always read the manual first.

Even if the code reports a bug??  as in "4294965856 rows cannot be reduced by 1440 BUG in 
reduce_data()".  It does quite clearly indicate BUG. 
Anyway, I've come up with a work-around for my immediately problem, so this is really
less important.


http://www.spamchek.ch/freetrial - lassen Sie sich überzeugen - 30 Tage Kostenlos!

Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

More information about the rrd-users mailing list