[rrd-users] Re: BUG: start=-6m vs. start=-180d
Per Jessen
per at computer.org
Mon Mar 14 21:29:55 MET 2005
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:03:37 +0100 (CET), Hakan Lindholm wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I've just this morning come across the following:
>>>> 1) running rrdtool graph with "--start=-6m" produces :
>>>> SANITY CHECK: 4294965856 rows cannot be reduced by 1440 BUG in reduce_data()
>>>> 2) running rrdtool graph with anywhere from "--start=-180d" to "--start=-190d" works fine.
>>>> I have a copy of the database if that helps.
>
>Always read the manual first.
Even if the code reports a bug?? as in "4294965856 rows cannot be reduced by 1440 BUG in
reduce_data()". It does quite clearly indicate BUG.
Anyway, I've come up with a work-around for my immediately problem, so this is really
less important.
/Per
--
http://www.spamchek.ch/freetrial - lassen Sie sich überzeugen - 30 Tage Kostenlos!
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list