[rrd-users] Re: Randomly blocky graphs
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at ergens.op.het.net
Fri Oct 7 20:18:12 MEST 2005
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:30:20PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> '--start', -10800,
> '--width', '500',
No '--end' so use the default of 'now'. 'Now' is almost always later than
the last update time of the database, you may want to change that.
[snip 8 times DEF: {servers,players}{avg,max,min,last}]
[snip 6 DEFs being used: {servers,players}{avg,max,last}]
This will not be the source of the problem, but why graph 6 out of 8 ?
> step = 300
> rra[0].cf = "AVERAGE" > rra[0].rows = 288 > rra[0].pdp_per_row = 1
> rra[1].cf = "AVERAGE" > rra[1].rows = 700 > rra[1].pdp_per_row = 6
> rra[2].cf = "AVERAGE" > rra[2].rows = 372 > rra[2].pdp_per_row = 24
> rra[3].cf = "AVERAGE" > rra[3].rows = 730 > rra[3].pdp_per_row = 288
[snip similar RRAs but with {max,min,last}]
There should always be enough PDPs available in the RRA with 1 PDP per CDP.
I've looked at the RRA selection mechanism and cannot see why it would
select another RRA. I even ran a test program, using various values for
start,end and for last update of the database. It always returned RRA 0.
In other words: no bug found. If there is one, I couldn't find it.
Perhaps this solves your problem: do specify '--end', let it be a whole
multiple of 300 and let it be in the past, not in the future.
Alternatively: specify '--end now-300 --start end-10800'.
--
Alex van den Bogaerdt
http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-users-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-users
mailing list