[rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit

[Ulf Zimmermann]

No, here is an example:

296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 12:00 cpu-idle.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-idle.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 12:00 cpu-interrupt.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58
cpu-interrupt.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 12:00 cpu-nice.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-nice.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 11:59 cpu-softirq.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-softirq.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 12:00 cpu-system.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-system.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 11:59 cpu-user.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-user.rrd.x86_64
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296728 Nov  1 11:59 cpu-wait.rrd
296 -rw-r--r--   1 root root 296944 Nov  1 11:58 cpu-wait.rrd.x86_64

The rrd.x86_64 files were what I just had on our RedHat EL4 x86_64
machines. I converted them to i386. Filesize is not much different.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rrd-users-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:rrd-users-
> bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Michael Renner
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 09:10
> To: rrd-users at lists.oetiker.ch
> Subject: [rrd-users] filesize using 32-bit vs. 64-bit
> 
> Moin,
> 
> just for curiosity: does a rrd file made with a 64-bit perl wil have
the
> double size of one made using a 32-bit perl?
> 
> Thanks
> --
> |Michael Renner      E-mail: michael.renner at gmx.de  |
> |D-81541 Munich      Germany        ICQ: #112280325 |
> |Germany             Don't drink as root!      ESC:wq
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rrd-users mailing list
> rrd-users at lists.oetiker.ch
> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users