[rrd-users] Average problem

Gwenael Lahay gwenael.lahay at wanadoo.fr
Mon Nov 19 17:09:05 CET 2007

Yes, i clearly need that the tool returns a value in this case.
Thank you for your help.

2007/11/19, Simon Hobson <linux at thehobsons.co.uk>:
> Gwenael Lahay wrote:
> >Indeed, i put a wrong command in my previous mail. The frequency is
> >not correct but the other parameters is good.
> >Concerning my problem, does it mean that i should use a very hight
> >value for xff (like 0.9 or 0.99) ?
> You need to consider your requirements.
> If it is important to get a value returned at 10:30 when you only put
> in the one value, then yes, you will have to use a large xff value
> (at least 0.97).
> However, that means you will still get a value returned at other
> times when 29 of the 30 samples are missing - or 25 are missing, or
> 10, or ...
> So you need to consider whether it's more important to have the value
> - or to show that input data was missing.
> _______________________________________________
> rrd-users mailing list
> rrd-users at lists.oetiker.ch
> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-users/attachments/20071119/e8c592ad/attachment.html 

More information about the rrd-users mailing list