[rrd-users] Multiple RRA for pdp_per_row of 1
s.shipway at auckland.ac.nz
Wed Dec 31 00:07:52 CET 2008
> > I knew there was something I was missing. If you try to graph MAX and
> > only have AVERAGE rra for pdp_per_row it will use the first MAX rra it
> > finds instead.
> > Is there a way around this without forcing the resolution or do I need
> > to store the MAX rra and just fill it with the AVERAGE data?
> Any ideas? I am guessing I'm going to be forced to duplicate my AVERAGE
> rra into a MAX rra for pdp_per_row 1.
Since, at pdp_per_row=1, MAX is effectively the same as AVG, your MAX RRA
would be redundant except that it would, as you say, prevent a higher
pdp_per_row MAX RRA from being taken in preference if you ask for a MAX at
this resolution. However, why would you be asking for a MAX at this
resolution? If you're coding this yourself then just take the AVG instead
as it is the same data - this is why MRTG doesn't display peak lines for
On reflection, though, I notice that MRTG DOES create a pdp_per_row=1 MAX
RRA by default as I think it helps with other time-period MAX calculations -
if you ask for a single value of max(ds) between t0 and t1, I believe it
looks for a MAX RRA with the least overlap from (t0,t1] to calculate from.
This may be a candidate for RRDtool optimisation (if you need a
pdp_per_row=1 MAX RRA and one is not available, then a pdp_per_row=1 AVG or
LAST will do just as well)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3133 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/rrd-users/attachments/20081231/fde3ccf7/attachment.bin
More information about the rrd-users