[rrd-users] rrdtool 1.4.x without graphing support?

[Ulf Zimmermann]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobias Oetiker [mailto:tobi at oetiker.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:07 PM
> To: Ulf Zimmermann
> Cc: rrd-users at lists.oetiker.ch
> Subject: RE: [rrd-users] rrdtool 1.4.x without graphing support?
> 
> Hi Ulf,
> 
> Today Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> 
> > > > > I am right now looking for librrd, including rrdcached (as
> > > > > client) to be used for collectd. You wrote above that cached
> uses
> > > > > glib?
> > > >
> > > > yes cached uses it, but only on the server ... clients do not use
> > > > cached ...
> > >
> > > Ok, I will patch out the check for it in configure.ac for now
> >
> > I do not see an option to specific not rrd_daemon, so after removing
> the glib check in configure.ac, I added still CPPFLAGS to the configure
> for it to find the include files of the older glib 2.4.17, as otherwise
> the compile of rrd_daemon.c complains about all the glib includes.
> >
> > This results still into two errors:
> >
> > if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -
> DLOCALEDIR="\"/home/ulf/tmp4/testinstall/share/locale\"" -
> DVERSION='"1.4.2"' -DLOCALSTATEDIR='"/home/ulf/tmp4/testinstall/var"' -
> I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -
> I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -
> std=c99 -pedantic -Wundef -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -
> Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Winline -
> Wold-style-definition -W  -fPIC -DPIC -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-strict-
> aliasing -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic -Wundef -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -
> Wcast-align -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-
> externs -Winline -Wold-style-definition -W  -fPIC -DPIC -MT rrdcached-
> rrd_daemon.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/rrdcached-rrd_daemon.Tpo" -c -o
> rrdcached-rrd_daemon.o `test -f 'rrd_daemon.c' || echo
> './'`rrd_daemon.c; \
> > then mv -f ".deps/rrdcached-rrd_daemon.Tpo" ".deps/rrdcached-
> rrd_daemon.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/rrdcached-rrd_daemon.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> > rrd_daemon.c: In function `flush_old_values':
> > rrd_daemon.c:822: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> > rrd_daemon.c: In function `handle_request_forget':
> > rrd_daemon.c:1271: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> >
> > This is on the 1.4.2 code, line 822 is:
> >
> >     assert( g_tree_remove(cache_tree, cfd.keys[k]) == TRUE );
> >
> > Line 1271 is:
> >
> >   found = g_tree_remove(cache_tree, file);
> >
> > In version 2.4.17 g_tree_remove returns void, in version 2.8 and
> later this changes to Boolean. Function is used once to assert, I think
> I can just patch that out to not check for TRUE and assert. But the
> other location at 1271 wants to do something based on the return. Any
> suggestion if I can patch out the journal_write?
> 
> do you need rrd_cached ? I thought you were doing clients ... they
> do not need it ... just don't compile rrd_cached.

No I don't need it, what is the easiest way of disabling the compile of it?