[rrd-users] RRDTOOL Good with step 300, Bad with step 600

[xajepa]

thanks, thanks, thanks
 


Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:38:39 -0800
From: ml-node+6162953-1078388733-324630 at n2.nabble.com
To: angles at hotmail.fr
Subject: Re: RRDTOOL Good with step 300, Bad with step 600

xajepa wrote: 

>If I chose a step 600 (not equal to 300), it is bad : 
>Bad Code : 
>rrdtool create  ${FICRRD}.rrd --step 600 --start 978303900 
>DS:b600:GAUGE:600:0:U \ 
>           RRA:AVERAGE:0:1:3 
>  rrdtool update  ${FICRRD}.rrd \ 
>           978304500:2 \ 
>           978305100:1 \ 
>           978305700:4 

978304500 is not an integer multiple of 600 - therefore your data it 
normalised into buckets that start/end on times that are. 

http://www.vandenbogaerdt.nl/rrdtool/
See "Rates, normalizing and consolidating" 

-- 
Simon Hobson 

Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed 
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as 
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. 

_______________________________________________ 
rrd-users mailing list 
[hidden email] 
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users






If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:http://rrd-mailinglists.937164.n2.nabble.com/RRDTOOL-Good-with-step-300-Bad-with-step-600-tp6162917p6162953.html 
To unsubscribe from RRDTOOL Good with step 300, Bad with step 600, click here.  		 	   		  

--
View this message in context: http://rrd-mailinglists.937164.n2.nabble.com/RRDTOOL-Good-with-step-300-Bad-with-step-600-tp6162917p6168130.html
Sent from the RRDtool Users Mailinglist mailing list archive at Nabble.com.