[rrd-users] Stacking at Infinity
chris at noodles.org.uk
Sun Mar 4 22:12:26 CET 2012
Thank you for taking your time to respond.
To ensure I understand this correctly, this will print a TICK on the
graph for each DS. It will either be RED or GREEN depending
on the value of the DS?
The problem I have is I am graphing classes for QoS with a different
number of classes per graph. I would prefer it to only show TICKs if I
have drops within that class and I would like the TICK to be the same
colour as the Octets for that class.
Class1Drops = 0
Class2Drops = 100
Class3Drops = 0
Class4Drops = 57
I have also defined ClassXOctets for each respective class which is
coloured according to an algorithm. If I detect drops in any of the
classes then I draw the background red using INF/NEGINF. However, to
identify the specific classes I wanted to draw a TICK using the colour
of that class.
The above scenario would result in 3 TICKs being printed on the graph
using the respective colour of that class. I suppose it would be nice
to have TICK stacking where I could append '::STACK' to the end of
In the event of using a CDEF for the fraction value I am still
struggling to work out how to achieve the desired result because I
would have to start with the highest fraction value. I am not sure if
the following would work:
On 4 March 2012 12:52, Martin Sperl <rrdtool at martin.sperl.org> wrote:
> OK, so assuming those 3:
> Here a "Red/green" colorcoding you could also use:
> # here graph the other stuff (on top of the ticks!)
> Then you would get 3 stripes that are green/red in the relevant sections of the DS being undefined
> If you want even "bars" separating those 3 sections:
> add the following:
> that should show bars all the length of the graph with green/red in between
> I also have sent a patch to Tobi to allow TICK to use the values of the DEF/CDEF itself as the fraction - so this could mean a non-constant fraction...
> This may also be helpful in some usecases to present data...
> On 03.03.2012, at 13:44, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> One line at the top (or bottom) of the graph, then stack a suffient amount
>>> in the "wrong" direction. I never tried it, but stacking -50M "on top" of
>>> 150M should get you at 100M.
>> So this works normally when not working at infinity:
>> I assumed the LINE would take into consideration the lines width when
>> stacking so I could use -1 as the value. This doesn't seem to work and
>> I have to use an actual value but this value would be dependant on the
>> scale of the data.
>> However, when I draw the first line at INF then it doesn't seem to
>> work and have looked into the possibility of achieving the desired
>> affect using TICKs as suggested by Martin:
>>> I remember that I have done so to highlight times when we have exceeded predictions.
>>> You could obviously paint multiple TICKS for different types and paint them with different colors using transparency.
>>> As the color (de)coding may be a pain you possibly could draw multiple ticks of different fractions.
>> This looks promising and I have used the following to get my desired affect:
>> ** ifOutDrops is INF or NEGINF if drops detected.
>> This is so close to what I want to achieve, where each TICK is 1% of
>> the Y axis. To get a stacking affect I am overlapping TICKs with the
>> bottom one being slightly taller than the next one.
>> Now, this works if all classes have drops in, but in most cases they
>> don't and it is only a single class which has drops. If it was DS3 and
>> DS1 then the DS3 TICK would be visibly 2% tall as opposed to 1%.
>> Is it possible to calculate the fraction dynamically depending if I
>> have drops in the classes or is there an alternative approach?
More information about the rrd-users