no, this was not about steps, just about the accuracy of your timestamps as you run the update command. Tobias Oetiker tobi at oetiker.ch 062 775 9902 On 17.04.2013, at 14:44, Oliver Loch <grimeton at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi, > > So if I want steps in 0.25 seconds, I just use 14400 instead of 3600 ? > > This "step thing" is really confusing sometimes. > > Cu >