[smokeping-users] CheckLoss - Bug or Feature?
Rui Meireles
rmeireles at tec.dsr.telecom.pt
Fri Feb 1 12:48:36 CET 2008
Hi. I'm trying Smokeping for the first time.
I don't understand the mechanics of CheckLoss matcher.
CheckLoss(l=>3,x=>4)
Does this mean an alarm will be raised if there are:
1 - at least 3 packets loss in the last 4 pollings?
2 - at least 3 packets loss in each of the last 4 pollings?
3 - 3% packet loss in the last 4 pollings?
4 - 3% packet loss in each of the last 4 pollings?
Despite this, this matcher is not working well. When a device becomes
unreachable, usually I start receiving flapping alarms, that go on (Raised,
Cleared, Raised, Cleared, .) until there are no 100% losses in the small
historic that comes with the e-mail.
When the device comes back to life, this usually happens too.
Ex.:
#####################################################
Thu Jan 31 20:03:43 2008
Alert "someloss" was raised for
http://172.28.154.41/cgi-bin/smokeping/smokeping.cgi?target=WAN.Rede_Tecnica
.Rui_Meireles
Pattern
-------
CheckLoss(l=>3,x=>4)
Data (old --> now)
------------------
loss: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%,
0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 100%,
100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%
rtt: 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms,
0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms,
0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, U, U, U, U, U, U, U, U
Comment
-------
Perdas Detectadas
#####################################################
Thu Jan 31 20:08:43 2008
Alert "someloss" was cleared for
http://172.28.154.41/cgi-bin/smokeping/smokeping.cgi?target=WAN.Rede_Tecnica
.Rui_Meireles
Pattern
-------
CheckLoss(l=>3,x=>4)
Data (old --> now)
------------------
loss: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%,
0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 100%, 100%,
100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%
rtt: 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms,
0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms,
0ms, 0ms, 0ms, 0ms, U, U, U, U, U, U, U, U, U
Comment
-------
Perdas Detectadas
#####################################################
In the example above (2 of the many e-mails I received) why was the alarm
cleared? There is no reason for that!
And why is it showing such a big historic, if I specified 4 values?
If anyone could help me, I would deeply appreciate it. All I want is to
generate alarms when there are some (few) packet losses, and terminate them
as soon as the situation resolves.
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20080201/658178e2/attachment-0001.html
More information about the smokeping-users
mailing list