From beutel at tik.ee.ethz.ch Wed Dec 2 03:13:40 2009 From: beutel at tik.ee.ethz.ch (Jan Beutel) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:13:40 +0100 Subject: [smokeping-users] running on a heterogeneous environment Message-ID: <007001ca72f5$10f8df60$32ea9e20$@ee.ethz.ch> Hello all, I am running a master on linux and a slave on windows. So far so good. Don't ask why I do this, it's been a major nightshift to get this far. When the windows smokeping installation runs standalone (no master slave) everything is fine but when I run in slave mode on windows I get: FPing: probing 5 targets... FPING: Executing /usr/bin/fping -C 20 ... and so on Yielding a nice 'Ping: Got fping output: 'The system cannot find the specified path' Any ideas how to force smokeping to use the local configured path for fping (c:/smokeping/bin/fping.exe) instead of the one sent over by the master (/usr/bin/fping)? Jan Dr. Jan Beutel j.beutel at ieee.org Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETZ G75 ETH Zurich +41 44 632 70 32 Phone Gloriastrasse 35 +41 44 632 10 35 Fax CH 8092 Zurich/Switzerland http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~beutel From hardenrm at uiuc.edu Wed Dec 2 05:50:53 2009 From: hardenrm at uiuc.edu (Ryan Harden) Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:50:53 -0600 Subject: [smokeping-users] running on a heterogeneous environment In-Reply-To: <007001ca72f5$10f8df60$32ea9e20$@ee.ethz.ch> References: <007001ca72f5$10f8df60$32ea9e20$@ee.ethz.ch> Message-ID: <4B15F22D.4060506@uiuc.edu> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an '++override' option in the config of the master to override the path of any binary being run. I use the following on my linux master to direct my OSX slaves to their local fping. +mmon1-a display_name=mmon1-a color=00ff00 ++override Probes.FPing.binary = /opt/local/sbin/fping (and so forth for each slave) Perhaps you can massage that in a way that works for you? /Ryan Jan Beutel wrote: > Hello all, > > I am running a master on linux and a slave on windows. So far so good. Don't > ask why I do this, it's been a major nightshift to get this far. > > When the windows smokeping installation runs standalone (no master slave) > everything is fine but when I run in slave mode on windows I get: > > FPing: probing 5 targets... > FPING: Executing /usr/bin/fping -C 20 ... and so on > > Yielding a nice > > 'Ping: Got fping output: 'The system cannot find the specified path' > > > Any ideas how to force smokeping to use the local configured path for fping > (c:/smokeping/bin/fping.exe) instead of the one sent over by the master > (/usr/bin/fping)? > > > Jan > > > > Dr. Jan Beutel j.beutel at ieee.org > Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETZ G75 > ETH Zurich +41 44 632 70 32 Phone > Gloriastrasse 35 +41 44 632 10 35 Fax > CH 8092 Zurich/Switzerland http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/~beutel > > > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users - -- Ryan M. Harden, BS, KC9IHX Office: 217-265-5192 CITES - Network Engineering Cell: 217-689-1363 2130 Digital Computer Lab, Fax: 217-244-7089 1304 W. Springfield email: hardenrm at illinois.edu Urbana, IL 61801 University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign - All your Base - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksV8iwACgkQtuPckBBbXbqM0QCdHt9y6Q6fKb9/RcIAxjqzYMJv 4YMAn1ohmryvg0qbvJ6PvTijS5+e3oqi =Rgye -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From Mark.Dawson at imc-chicago.com Wed Dec 2 21:06:32 2009 From: Mark.Dawson at imc-chicago.com (Mark Dawson) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:06:32 -0600 Subject: [smokeping-users] Has anyone gotten Multiple Target Graphs to work with TCPPing probes? (Smokeping 2.004002) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: When I throw my slave server into debug mode, I see why it can't do the multi-target graphs with TCPPing since that module takes only one IP as a target, yet the master sends it the multiple IPs along the one command line (which works fine with FPing). Has anyone gotten this to work with the TCPPing probe? The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and /or privileged material. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive this e-mail, he / she shall not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you receive this e-mail unintentionally, please inform us immediately by "reply" and then delete it from your system. Although this information has been compiled with great care, neither IMC Financial Markets & Asset Management nor any of its related entities shall accept any responsibility for any errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in this information or for the consequences thereof, nor shall it be bound in any way by the contents of this e-mail or its attachments. In the event of incomplete or incorrect transmission, please return the e-mail to the sender and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Messages and attachments are scanned for all known viruses. Always scan attachments before opening them. From jimmyjose2980 at gmail.com Fri Dec 4 19:34:36 2009 From: jimmyjose2980 at gmail.com (Jimmyboy) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:04:36 +0530 Subject: [smokeping-users] Smoketrace installation. Message-ID: Hi All, I have installed Smokeping 2.3.0-1 on my Ubuntu Hardy system. Smokeping and its pre-requisites have been installed using the debian repository files. It is working nicely. I need to install Smoketrace on this machine.I followed the link http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smoketrace.en.html, but, I could not find the directories mentioned on my system. Is there any other way of installing it? Thanks, Jimmy =-=-= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20091205/9fd414bf/attachment.htm From tobi at oetiker.ch Sun Dec 6 23:55:43 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:55:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] remOcular - what tobi has been up to ... Message-ID: Over the last few weeks I have spent a lot of time hacking on a new project remOcular - your eyes in the cloud The first test version is now online on http://tobi.oetiker.ch/test/remocular/build/ remOcular is an indirect decendent of SmokeTrace. It can run comand line tools remotely and provides a live presentation of their output in the webbrowser. remOcular ... . has a very powerful api for writing new backend plugins to integrate additional command lined tools. Developement time for a new plugin can be as little as 10 minutes. . consists of a simple backend written in perl and a interactive frontend written in pure qooxdoo javascript. . can show nifty inline graphs using canvas graphics (only with ff, chrome, safari, opera) . will be released as GPL opensource software in the next few days. cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From abirgisson at fattoc.com Thu Dec 10 18:44:30 2009 From: abirgisson at fattoc.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=C1rni_Birgisson?=) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:44:30 +0000 Subject: [smokeping-users] Multiple graphs on one page Message-ID: <7405CC27-3116-4B97-8C95-A36F626A78F2@fattoc.com> Hi everybody, I've read through a lot of configuration examples and searched the archives but I can't seem to find a definite answer to this. I'm trying to create an overview page in Smokeping that should contain Multiple graphs (for different hosts). I don't want them all bundled to a single graph with multiple lines, since they have very different response times and it doesn't work quite well on a single graph. Can anybody give me an example on how to do this correctly ? My config is something like: + Servers menu = Servers ++ Server1 host = server1 ++ Server2 host = server2 ++ Server3 host = server3 Now when i click the "Servers" link in the tree, i just get an empty page but the tree expands and I can see links for the servers. Thanks in advance -Arni Arni Birgisson Network Engineer FATTOC Iceland Adalstraeti 6 101 Reykjavik Iceland From tobi at oetiker.ch Mon Dec 14 23:45:28 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:45:28 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] remOcular (aka SmokeTrace TNG) is almost ready of release Message-ID: I spent another day hacking remOcular ... it is almost ready for release now ... documentation and the website are next on my todo list. Now the graphics work even in IE http://tobi.oetiker.ch/test/remocular/build/#ACT=RUN;PLG=RemOcular::Plugin::TraceRoute;host=ipv6.google.com;rounds=30;interval=1;iplevel=IPv6;method=udp cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From nathanlong at gmail.com Thu Dec 17 15:57:32 2009 From: nathanlong at gmail.com (Nathan Long) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:57:32 -0500 Subject: [smokeping-users] Running a script on Smokeping alert Message-ID: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> Is there any documentation for having Smokeping run an external script when an alert is triggered? Mailing list searches make me thing people are doing it, but I'm having trouble figuring out how. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20091217/79c24410/attachment.htm From rjd at merit.edu Thu Dec 17 16:40:47 2009 From: rjd at merit.edu (Russell Dwarshuis) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:40:47 -0500 (EST) Subject: [smokeping-users] Running a script on Smokeping alert In-Reply-To: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> References: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: It's documented, search for 'pipe' in the manual: http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smokeping_config.en.html -Russell Dwarshuis On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Nathan Long wrote: > Is there any documentation for having Smokeping run an external script when > an alert is triggered? Mailing list searches make me thing people are doing > it, but I'm having trouble figuring out how. > From sronan at fattoc.com Thu Dec 17 20:58:25 2009 From: sronan at fattoc.com (Shane Ronan) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:58:25 -0800 Subject: [smokeping-users] Running a script on Smokeping alert In-Reply-To: References: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Does any one have an example of this, the documentation is VERY confusing. I am attempting to use this to send alerts to syslog. Thanks, Shane On Dec 17, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Russell Dwarshuis wrote: > It's documented, search for 'pipe' in the manual: > http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smokeping_config.en.html > > > -Russell Dwarshuis > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Nathan Long wrote: > >> Is there any documentation for having Smokeping run an external script when >> an alert is triggered? Mailing list searches make me thing people are doing >> it, but I'm having trouble figuring out how. >> > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users From nathanlong at gmail.com Thu Dec 17 21:06:39 2009 From: nathanlong at gmail.com (Nathan Long) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:06:39 -0500 Subject: [smokeping-users] Running a script on Smokeping alert In-Reply-To: References: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4b310410912171206i6a53d1daid3f462b035cee2b8@mail.gmail.com> *from smokeping config. *** Alerts *** to = | program_name It sounds like you can specify both programs and alerts here, separated by commas. For example: *** Alerts *** to = | program_name,bob at abc.com,program_name2 However, I haven't tested this out yet to be sure I have the right idea. Does anyone know if it would be possible to run a different script for each site, even if the alert is the same? Nate On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Shane Ronan wrote: > Does any one have an example of this, the documentation is VERY confusing. > I am attempting to use this to send alerts to syslog. > > Thanks, > Shane > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Russell Dwarshuis wrote: > > > It's documented, search for 'pipe' in the manual: > > http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smokeping_config.en.html > > > > > > -Russell Dwarshuis > > > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Nathan Long wrote: > > > >> Is there any documentation for having Smokeping run an external script > when > >> an alert is triggered? Mailing list searches make me thing people are > doing > >> it, but I'm having trouble figuring out how. > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > smokeping-users mailing list > > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20091217/c21aabe3/attachment.htm From rjd at merit.edu Thu Dec 17 23:04:25 2009 From: rjd at merit.edu (Russell Dwarshuis) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:04:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: [smokeping-users] Running a script on Smokeping alert In-Reply-To: References: <4b310410912170657q22377476m9ebe721ac9748f10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: For what it's worth, here's what I used for awhile in a homebrew script: +anyLoss type = loss # in percent pattern = >1% to = |/usr/local/smokeping/contrib/mtb_email.pl comment = any loss And then in my perl script: my ($name_of_alert,$target,$loss_pattern,$rtt_pattern,$hostname) = @ARGV; ------------------------------------ So you could do something like: to = |/your/path/to/syslogit.pl And have syslogit.pl be as simple as: #!/bin/perl my ($name_of_alert,$target,$loss_pattern,$rtt_pattern,$hostname) = @ARGV; `/bin/logger $hostname $target $name_of_alert`; -Russell Dwarshuis On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Shane Ronan wrote: > Does any one have an example of this, the documentation is VERY > confusing. I am attempting to use this to send alerts to syslog. > > Thanks, > Shane > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Russell Dwarshuis wrote: > >> It's documented, search for 'pipe' in the manual: >> http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/doc/smokeping_config.en.html >> >> >> -Russell Dwarshuis >> >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Nathan Long wrote: >> >>> Is there any documentation for having Smokeping run an external script when >>> an alert is triggered? Mailing list searches make me thing people are doing >>> it, but I'm having trouble figuring out how. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> smokeping-users mailing list >> smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch >> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > > From openbsd.shen at gmail.com Mon Dec 21 07:23:55 2009 From: openbsd.shen at gmail.com (openbsd shen) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:23:55 +0800 Subject: [smokeping-users] No targets returned by the sorter. Message-ID: <6ff3e7140912202223n5083e792h9020766984fa2d51@mail.gmail.com> In my smokeping site, all charts is ok, but in the main page, it shows: The most interesting destinations Top Standard Deviation No targets returned by the sorter. Top Packet Loss No targets returned by the sorter. Top Max Roundtrip Time No targets returned by the sorter. Top Median Roundtrip Time No targets returned by the sorter. Why there're all "No targets returned by the sorter"? Thanks From tobi at oetiker.ch Mon Dec 21 18:37:02 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:37:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update Message-ID: Users today I have spent some quality time with fping, integrating all the debian patches as well as adding a new -O flag for setting the type of service. I have sent the result to the maintainer of fping. You can get a copy from http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/pub/ fping-2.4b2_to3-ipv6.tar.gz Thanks to virtela.net for sponsoring this work. cheers tobi ps: Note that the ipv6 in the file name is a bit misleading, you only get the ipv6 version of the tool when you compile it with -DIPV6 which renders you a IpV6 ONLY version ... Now looking for a sponsor todo an integrated version with -4 / -6 options. -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From echatham at broadvox.com Wed Dec 23 23:22:58 2009 From: echatham at broadvox.com (Eric Chatham) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:22:58 -0500 Subject: [smokeping-users] Change Someloss Alert Message-ID: <4ABA3E162F60624A949503A7F960245EB1D38F20A2@CLEHBEXMS01.broadvox.local> Hello, I would like to change the "someloss" (or add a new alert) on the smokeping config to detect *any* packet loss after the third poll. How would I set the pattern up to reflect that? This is my current config right now: *** Alerts *** to = ~ from = smokealert@ ~ +someloss type = loss # in percent pattern = >0%,*12*,>0%,*12*,>0% comment = loss 3 times in a row Also, is there a way to modify the subject line of the e-mail alert? Thank you and happy holidays, Eric Chatham ________________________________ CONFIDENTIAL. This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and should be destroyed and/or returned if you are not the intended and proper recipient. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20091223/6d52085a/attachment.htm From scubacuda at gmail.com Fri Dec 25 18:50:48 2009 From: scubacuda at gmail.com (Rogelio) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:50:48 -0800 Subject: [smokeping-users] Using Smokeping to monitor large layer 1/2 networks (e.g. large WiFi mesh networks) Message-ID: <2b7af7c40912250950g54ebaaa2vdd4f47bebeb11cd9@mail.gmail.com> I'm looking for tools that help me determine the latency across large wireless mesh networks, and I'm wondering if Smokeping is the answer. I will have hundreds (and in some cases, possibly 1000+) wireless cell sites, some of which are linked only with unlicensed backhaul (e.g. 802.11a on 5.8 GHz). In network terms, this is pretty much one giant layer 2 network. I'd like to measure latency across all of these mesh links in the hopes of finding when a link is "bad" (low RSSI [receive signal], which lowers the data rate, means congestion, or a possibility a combination between the two). Because of the way that this network is setup (few ethernet egress points), having slave nodes out in the field is not that easy. Can Smokeping tell me the "hop" between each link (i.e. layer 1/2 link)? When I see the demos, I see either (a) hops between layer three networks (e.g. SmokeTrace), or (b) Smokeping results between master / slave nodes. From stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com Fri Dec 25 18:57:10 2009 From: stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com (stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:57:10 +0100 Subject: [smokeping-users] On vacations until January 4th 2009 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4AFFF9910030DBEB@d3smsg01p.services.thales> ----- The following is an automated response ----- to your message generated on behalf of stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com Hello, I am on vacation until the January 4th 2009. I will only reply to urgent messages. Regards, S. Demailly From kevin at safelink.net Mon Dec 28 19:14:05 2009 From: kevin at safelink.net (Kevin Neal) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:14:05 -0700 Subject: [smokeping-users] Force Multiprocess Mode Message-ID: Hello everyone, Over the holiday I added a lot of new targets to my configuration, I'm now running into this error: "FPing: WARNING: smokeping took 78 seconds to complete 1 round of polling. It should complete polling in 60 seconds. You may have unresponsive devices in your setup." I don't have any unresponsive devices but do have a lot of devices and firing off a round every 60 seconds. I also see where smokeping is doing this: "Not entering multiprocess mode for just a single probe." I am curious if I can force multiprocess mode, or if it would make any difference since it is a single probe defined. If there are any other optimizations that I could do I'd be interested in that as well. Here is my FPing probe configuration: + FPing" binary = /usr/sbin/fping blazemode = true " -Kevin From tobi at oetiker.ch Mon Dec 28 21:15:27 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:15:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] Force Multiprocess Mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Kevin, Today Kevin Neal wrote: > Hello everyone, > Over the holiday I added a lot of new targets to my configuration, > I'm now running into this error: > > "FPing: WARNING: smokeping took 78 seconds to complete 1 round of > polling. It should complete polling in 60 seconds. You may have > unresponsive devices in your setup." > > I don't have any unresponsive devices but do have a lot of devices and > firing off a round every 60 seconds. I also see where smokeping is > doing this: > > "Not entering multiprocess mode for just a single probe." > > I am curious if I can force multiprocess mode, or if it would make any > difference since it is a single probe defined. If there are any other > optimizations that I could do I'd be interested in that as well. Here > is my FPing probe configuration: > > + FPing" > > binary = /usr/sbin/fping > blazemode = true > you can create two instances of the FPing probe and asigned half the targets to one and the other half to the second probe ... cheers tobi > > > -Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From Doerchi at web.de Tue Dec 29 21:18:13 2009 From: Doerchi at web.de (Dirk Henze) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:18:13 +0100 Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update Message-ID: <1432416823@web.de> Hi, how could I set the -O flag in smokeping? Thanks and I wish you all a happy new year, Dirk ______________________________________________________ GRATIS f?r alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de From rjd at merit.edu Wed Dec 30 01:19:01 2009 From: rjd at merit.edu (Russell Dwarshuis) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: [smokeping-users] Using Smokeping to monitor large layer 1/2 networks (e.g. large WiFi mesh networks) In-Reply-To: <2b7af7c40912250950g54ebaaa2vdd4f47bebeb11cd9@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b7af7c40912250950g54ebaaa2vdd4f47bebeb11cd9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: In addition to master/slave, smokeping can use some types of network nodes to graph results. See IOSPing, TelnetIOSPing, CiscoRTTMonEchoICMP, TelnetJunOSPing at http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/probe/index.en.html Smokeping has no knowledge of how packets are switched or routed so you would need to carefully craft your config file to show meaningful tests. If you have a giant layer 2 network you may not be able to devise tests across individual links since they're layer 3 tests but perhaps collections of links may still be useful if the layer 2 path(s) the packets are switched across is understood by the people looking at the graphs. Modern wireless backhaul links have vendor MIBs with RSSI, signal quality, link rates, etc. If they are available to you then you should monitor them directly instead of looking for symptoms (which could be caused by many different things) higher up the OSI stack. -Russell Dwarshuis On Fri, 25 Dec 2009, Rogelio wrote: > I'm looking for tools that help me determine the latency across large > wireless mesh networks, and I'm wondering if Smokeping is the answer. > I will have hundreds (and in some cases, possibly 1000+) wireless cell > sites, some of which are linked only with unlicensed backhaul (e.g. > 802.11a on 5.8 GHz). In network terms, this is pretty much one giant > layer 2 network. > > I'd like to measure latency across all of these mesh links in the > hopes of finding when a link is "bad" (low RSSI [receive signal], > which lowers the data rate, means congestion, or a possibility a > combination between the two). Because of the way that this network is > setup (few ethernet egress points), having slave nodes out in the > field is not that easy. > > Can Smokeping tell me the "hop" between each link (i.e. layer 1/2 > link)? When I see the demos, I see either (a) hops between layer > three networks (e.g. SmokeTrace), or (b) Smokeping results between > master / slave nodes. > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > From tobi at oetiker.ch Wed Dec 30 10:14:35 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:14:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update In-Reply-To: <1432416823@web.de> References: <1432416823@web.de> Message-ID: Hi Dirk, in smokeping trunk I have an updated version of the FPing plugin which supports a tos option ... svn cat svn://svn.oetiker.ch/smokeping/trunk/software/lib/Smokeping/probes/FPing.pm cheers tobi Yesterday Dirk Henze wrote: > Hi, > > how could I set the -O flag in smokeping? > > Thanks and I wish you all a happy new year, > > Dirk > > ______________________________________________________ > GRATIS f?r alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From Vern.Dias at VerizonWireless.com Thu Dec 31 15:35:18 2009 From: Vern.Dias at VerizonWireless.com (Dias, Vern) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:35:18 -0600 Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update In-Reply-To: References: <1432416823@web.de> Message-ID: <20091231144704.B0A747002A@james.oetiker.ch> Tobi Just tried to compile this on Solaris 10, and it's not going to work. "fping.c", line 695: undefined symbol: SO_BINDTODEVICE Apparently SO_BINDTODEVICE is not available on Solaris. Running the older fping version without problems. Any chance of making this version portable by avoiding implementation specific code? Thanks, Vern Dias -----Original Message----- From: smokeping-users-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:smokeping-users-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Tobias Oetiker Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:15 AM To: Dirk Henze Cc: smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch Subject: Re: [smokeping-users] fping update Hi Dirk, in smokeping trunk I have an updated version of the FPing plugin which supports a tos option ... svn cat svn://svn.oetiker.ch/smokeping/trunk/software/lib/Smokeping/probes/FPing .pm cheers tobi The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. From tobi at oetiker.ch Thu Dec 31 17:01:29 2009 From: tobi at oetiker.ch (Tobias Oetiker) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:01:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update In-Reply-To: <20091231144704.B0A747002A@james.oetiker.ch> References: <1432416823@web.de> <20091231144704.B0A747002A@james.oetiker.ch> Message-ID: HI Vern, Today Dias, Vern wrote: > > Tobi > > Just tried to compile this on Solaris 10, and it's not going to work. > > "fping.c", line 695: undefined symbol: SO_BINDTODEVICE > > Apparently SO_BINDTODEVICE is not available on Solaris. correct ... > > Running the older fping version without problems. > > Any chance of making this version portable by avoiding implementation > specific code? yes ... I added a check around the option and documented its existance :-) the new release is on http://oss.oetiker.ch/smokeping/pub btw I have added fping to our public development tree: svn://oss.oetiker.ch/optools/fping/trunk cheers tobi > > Thanks, Vern Dias > > -----Original Message----- > From: smokeping-users-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch > [mailto:smokeping-users-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Tobias > Oetiker > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 3:15 AM > To: Dirk Henze > Cc: smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > Subject: Re: [smokeping-users] fping update > > Hi Dirk, > > in smokeping trunk I have an updated version of the FPing plugin which > supports a tos option ... > > svn cat > svn://svn.oetiker.ch/smokeping/trunk/software/lib/Smokeping/probes/FPing > .pm > > cheers > tobi > > > The information contained in this message and any attachment may be > proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work > product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or > agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify me > immediately by replying to this message and deleting it and all > copies and backups thereof. Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > smokeping-users mailing list > smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users > > -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland http://it.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch ++41 62 775 9902 / sb: -9900 From stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com Thu Dec 31 17:01:38 2009 From: stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com (stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:01:38 +0100 Subject: [smokeping-users] On vacations until January 4th 2009 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4AFFF99100339935@d3smsg01p.services.thales> ----- The following is an automated response ----- to your message generated on behalf of stephen.demailly at thalesgroup.com Hello, I am on vacation until the January 4th 2009. I will only reply to urgent messages. Regards, S. Demailly From dirk.henze at nexgo.de Mon Dec 28 13:10:44 2009 From: dirk.henze at nexgo.de (dirk.henze at nexgo.de) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:10:44 -0000 Subject: [smokeping-users] fping update Message-ID: <20860035.1262002240305.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail17.arcor-online.net> Hi, nice feature. How can I add the fping -O feature in the smokeping-config. Thanks and best regards, Dirk Schluss mit teuer - her mit den Schn?ppchen! Jetzt alle Discounter-Angebote von Aldi ?ber Douglas bis Schlecker ?bersichtlich f?r Sie geordnet - jetzt klicken und sparen! http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.discounto