[smokeping-users] Measure latency to TCP ports

Celedonio Miranda Torresano celemiranda at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 15:46:48 CET 2007


Hi

look for hping probe :

http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/p/HPing.pm

I used and work very well for your requirements...



2007/12/13, tbh <tbh1000 at gmail.com>:
>
> On 12/13/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:59:37AM -0600,
> > tbh <tbh1000 at gmail.com> wrote
> > a message of 67 lines which said:
> >
> > > it appeared to me the EchoPing primarily is used to measure HTTP
> > > requests. It does have options for SSL and SMTP,
> >
> > or echo, discard or chargen :-)
>
> True...true...:-)
>
> >
> > > but I'm looking to measure latency to other ports as well (ie., FTP,
> > > Telnet, SSH, etc).
> >
> > Not done yet, although the new plugin architecture should make it easy
> > (I'm not sure I will include telnet support, is there any reason to
> > still use telnet today???)
> >
>
> Not really, I just threw it in as an example.
>
> > But, if you are interested only in TCP latency, any port will work,
> > no? I do not think there exists an OS which replies to connection on
> > port 80 faster or slower than on other ports.
> >
>
> My issue is that not all the hosts I'm measuring to are running a web
> server.
>
> Thanks for the responses!
>
> _______________________________________________
> smokeping-users mailing list
> smokeping-users at lists.oetiker.ch
> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/smokeping-users/attachments/20071214/db7c6b3f/attachment.html 


More information about the smokeping-users mailing list