[mrtg-developers] Re: MRTG 2.10 (fwd)
lorenzo at colitti.com
Tue May 27 18:00:45 MEST 2003
Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
>>>The problem is that we have to work around a bug in the Debian INET6
>>>module. Specifically, if you call IO::Socket::INET6->new() without
>>>specifying a remote address, INET6.pm will create an IPv4 socket, and
>>>IPv6 won't work.
> Then ( and only then ) this will be bug on INET6.pm
Yes, it is a bug in INET6.pm (the Debian version).
>>>The workaround for this bug is to specify the host and port in the
>>>IO::Socket::INET6->new() call. But this causes the "reply from different
>>>IPv6 address doesn't work" problem. So you can't just use a different
>>>INET6, you have to modify both INET6 and SNMP_Session.
> Did you ckeck my INET6.pm then ? If mine is sucessfull, then it would be
> easier to use the correct one than hacking the SNMP_Session.
If we use your INET6.pm, we have to change SNMP_Session.pm as well.
> Please, I think you are replying to "mrtg-developers-bounce". I didn't
> reach this message but forwareded by Tobias.
No, I sent it to mrtg-developers, with you in CC. You can see it in the
> Yes , I will try in the next hours... I have to investigate how the
> www.cpan.org works... searching the correct list...There are many...
Wait, before we do this it might be a good idea to contact the Debian
maintainer, Masahiro Omote. Maybe he is interested in maintaing INET6.pm
on CPAN as well...
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:mrtg-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
More information about the mrtg-developers