[mrtg] Re: MRTG problem
Dana Hudes
dhudes at hudes.org
Tue Sep 25 17:16:37 MEST 2001
btw my previous note I neglected to multiply by 1000000
40 Megabits/second raw = 5000000 octets/second.
300000000 octets/minute
4500000000 octets in 15 minutes.
0xC388D00
again, well within limit of Counter32.
I haven't looked at MIB-II in a long time. My copy of the Simple Book is the 2nd edition,
which uses the newer IP-MIB (different OID).
Hmm.
I find I have a pile of MIBs on my system from installing SNMP. I checked MIB-II.
The definition in question:
ifInOctets OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The total number of octets received on the
interface, including framing characters."
::= { ifEntry 10 }
I'm going to dig around for the definition of Counter.
Meanwhile, I suggest that you make your interval 10 minutes and see what happens.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kringle" <pkringle at planetnet.org>
To: <mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: [mrtg] Re: MRTG problem
>
> The sampling is at 15 minites.
>
> And MAXBYTES is set to
> MaxBytes[onvoy-ds3]:5863640
> I also tried
> MaxBytes[onvoy-ds3]:58636400
> just to see if it would help, which it didn't.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Dana Hudes wrote:
>
> > counter rollover?
> > what is your sampling interval?
> > IfInOctets is not a 64 bit number, only 32.
> > Still that should suffice for a 5 minute interval.
> >
> > Full 45mbit/second inbound is 5.625 Megabytes/second.
> > 1687.5 octets in 5 minutes is clearly well within even a 16-bit counter.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Peter Kringle" <pkringle at planetnet.org>
> > To: "mrtg" <mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:22 AM
> > Subject: [mrtg] MRTG problem
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I have noticed a very interesting problem with my DS3 connnection and
> > > MRTG. Every night when the usage is high (above 30Mb) the graphs go from
> > > 30Mb incoming to 2Mb incoming. Outgoing is not effective. Now I know
> > > this is not true, so does anyone know what would cause the graphs to do
> > > this?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Peter Kringle (DarkKnight)
> > > http://www.barrenwasteland.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
> > > Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
> > > FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
> > > WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
> >
>
> --
> Peter Kringle (DarkKnight)
> http://www.barrenwasteland.com
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
> Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
> FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
> WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list