[mrtg] Re: Class Based Queue

Paul C. Williamson pwilliamson at mandtbank.com
Fri Feb 1 15:25:23 MET 2002


So what about 

inbound.OID&something.that.returns.0:public at router1 + 
something.that.returns.0&outbound.OID:public at router1

Does that make sense?

Paul

>>> "Peter Barton" <pbarton at bbnow.com> 02/01/02 09:17AM >>>
I actually want inbound from router1 graphed green and outbound for router1
graphed blue.  However, the way the CBQs are handled by mrtg the inbound and
outbound are on separate CBQs and OIDs and in turn on seperate graphs.

Target[cbq.5.user]: OID1&OID2:public at router1 + OID3&OID4:public at router1
This statement will not give me what I am seeking.  It will only give me the
aggregate of traffic from both the inbound and outbound.

Any other help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

--
Peter Barton


--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe 
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg 
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org 
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi 



--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi



More information about the mrtg mailing list