[mrtg] Re: Class Based Queue
Paul C. Williamson
pwilliamson at mandtbank.com
Fri Feb 1 15:25:23 MET 2002
So what about
inbound.OID&something.that.returns.0:public at router1 +
something.that.returns.0&outbound.OID:public at router1
Does that make sense?
Paul
>>> "Peter Barton" <pbarton at bbnow.com> 02/01/02 09:17AM >>>
I actually want inbound from router1 graphed green and outbound for router1
graphed blue. However, the way the CBQs are handled by mrtg the inbound and
outbound are on separate CBQs and OIDs and in turn on seperate graphs.
Target[cbq.5.user]: OID1&OID2:public at router1 + OID3&OID4:public at router1
This statement will not give me what I am seeking. It will only give me the
aggregate of traffic from both the inbound and outbound.
Any other help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
--
Peter Barton
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list