[mrtg] Counter Overflow
Barry_Young at interliant.com
Barry_Young at interliant.com
Tue Feb 19 19:17:28 MET 2002
Basic question to end a long day with....
We have just started monitoring gigabit fibre interfaces on Cisco switches
using standard SNMPV1. As this is a heavily used uplink for a dedicated
backup server it is used excessively, do I need to worry about interface
counters wrapping and being reset? I assume there is a finite counter
limit that will be reached? Would it be preferable to use SNMPV2c or am I
going down the wrong track?
Is it easy to verify if a device supports the ifHC* counters under SNMPV2c.
Thanks in advance
__________________________________________________________
This message contains information intended only for named recipients.
If you have received this message in error, please delete it from your
system and notify the sender immediately by e-mail.
Information transmission via email cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free. The sender does not accept liability for errors or omissions in
the contents of this message arising as a result of e-mail transmission
problems.
--
Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the mrtg
mailing list