[mrtg] Re: Monitoring CPU on Win2K

Dave Morrow David.Morrow at autodata.net
Thu Nov 14 15:55:28 MET 2002

Actually, as my message indicates, the first two OIDs work for getting the
first two CPU's, and I am able to graph them no problem.  It's the next 2
CPU's that are not working, MRTG complains if I put 4 separate OIDs in the
Target line.

David Morrow 
Network Administrator 
Autodata Solutions Company 
Ph: (519) 951-6067 Fax: (519) 451-6615 
mailto: David.Morrow at autodata.net 

"Poor planning on your part does not necessitate an emergency on my part." 

This message has originated from Autodata Solutions Company.  The attached
material is the Confidential and Proprietary Information of Autodata
Solutions Company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
delete this message and notify the Autodata system administrator at
Administrator at autodata.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Edwin Slavin [mailto:SlavinE at sintaks.com] 
Sent: November 14, 2002 9:37 AM
To: 'Dave Morrow'; mrtg at list.ee.ethz.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitoring CPU on Win2K

The last # of the OID is the instance #... (probably: .0 = first instance .1
= second .2 = third .3 = fourth) 
though I'm sure some use 1 as 1 and so on... what OS? if win32 forget about
getting more than CPU #1 

Unsubscribe mailto:mrtg-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg
FAQ         http://faq.mrtg.org    Homepage     http://www.mrtg.org
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

More information about the mrtg mailing list