[mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Mon May 14 04:12:49 CEST 2007

Hi Mr. Gil,

Thank you so much resolving a query.

Here one more question where we specify this 64 bit Sign '::::' e.g.
public at 1.1.1.1::::2. I.e. is it in cfg maker command or in cfg file.

It will be grate helpful if you can text in sample codes of that
particular file.

Regards,

Yogesh Suryawanshi

________________________________

From: Mizrahi, Gil [mailto:gil.mizrahi at intel.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 8:04 PM
To: Yogesh Suryawanshi; Geba, Scott; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Hi,

64 bit counters were created to collect high capacity traffic (Giga and
above). The "regular" counters are 32 bit.

MRTG needs a special sign that tells to work with the 64 bit counters.
This sign is ':::::', e.g. public at 1.1.1.1:::::2.

As I said before it has significance when collecting Giga port and above
(TenGiga ...). 

As I know it doesn't have anything with the SNMP version.

________________________________

From: Yogesh Suryawanshi [mailto:Yogesh.Suryawanshi at wnsgs.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 7:03 AM
To: Mizrahi, Gil; Geba, Scott; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Dear All,

I am new to MRTG & this might be simple question for you all.

64bit counters? Where we can find it? What is its significance in MRTG?
Does it to do anything with SNMP version.

Regards,

Yogesh Suryawanshi

________________________________

From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Mizrahi, Gil
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 4:53 AM
To: Geba, Scott; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

What do you mean by rediscover? 

I erased the old RRD file and ran my new MRTG version on my cfg file.
Something more? 

________________________________

From: Geba, Scott [mailto:Scott_Geba at cable.comcast.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:34 PM
To: Mizrahi, Gil; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Store it with RRD and using 14-all.cgi

Did you rediscover the 10G ports after you upgraded?

________________________________

From: Mizrahi, Gil [mailto:gil.mizrahi at intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:16 AM
To: Geba, Scott; Mersberger, Robert; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Yes I am using the 64bit counters. Example
password at Some_Device_Name:::::2. 

How you store the data? As MRTG gif or as .rrd file? What front-end are
you using? 

________________________________

From: Geba, Scott [mailto:Scott_Geba at cable.comcast.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:05 PM
To: Mizrahi, Gil; Mersberger, Robert; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

I'm monitoring 3x10G port channels with traffic consistently around
15-20G as well as 4-5G on single 10G's.

Are you using the 64bit counters? public at 1.1.1.1:::::2      Something
like that? You need to use that in order to get the 10G 

What are you using for your cfgmaker commands? 

________________________________

From: Mizrahi, Gil [mailto:gil.mizrahi at intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:57 AM
To: Mizrahi, Gil; Mersberger, Robert; Geba, Scott; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Hi guys,

It took me sometime, I upgraded to mrtg-2.15.2 and I still get 100%
bandwidth of 4.19 Gbps.

1 more thing, when you say you collect with "no problems", did you
really saw traffic over 4 Gbps?

Thanks,

Gil.

________________________________

From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Mizrahi, Gil
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 10:37 PM
To: Mersberger, Robert; Geba, Scott; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Hi,

I am using version 2.11.1. I will try to upgrade and see what happens.

Thanks to all for your answers,

Gil.

________________________________

From: Mersberger, Robert [mailto:robert.mersberger at goldenven.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:27 PM
To: Geba, Scott; Mizrahi, Gil; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

We are running 10gig switches on our 4 6513's and using mrtg 2.17 have
seen no problems 

________________________________

From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Geba, Scott
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 7:55 AM
To: Mizrahi, Gil; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Which version of MRTG are you running? I had a similar problem but when
I upgraded to the latest MRTG it started discovering them all as 10G
ports and have been monitoring a few hundred of them for a few months
now. 

________________________________

From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Mizrahi, Gil
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 8:46 AM
To: mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: [mrtg] Monitor TenGiga ports

Hello,

I monitor TenGiga ports on Cisco routers (6506/9) with MRTG using 64-bit
counters (:::::2).

As I understand 64-bit counters can fit 10 Giga bit, nevertheless the
max bandwidth shown is ~4Gbps.

Why is that? Or what am I missing?

Thanks,

Gil.

CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE:
This e-mail message and any attachment(s) (collectively, this 'Email')
are intended 
only for the confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this 
message is not the intended recipient named above or an agent
responsible for 
delivering it to the intended recipient named above, you have received
this Email in error. 
Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this Email
and any copies thereof.

Disclaimer:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and
intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses 
and the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by the same. 
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are those
of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of WNS Group. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses 
and the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by the same. 
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of WNS Group. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20070514/fbeae4bb/attachment-0001.htm 