[mrtg] MRTG/RRD Intermittent Graphs
Darren.Terry at cox.com
Darren.Terry at cox.com
Mon Feb 4 18:42:29 CET 2008
-----Original Message-----
From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of McDonald, Dan
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 12:37 PM
To: mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] MRTG/RRD Intermittent Graphs
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 11:57 -0500, Darren.Terry at cox.com wrote:
> I went from a 32-bit linux system with 2.4 series kernel to a 64-bit
> linux system with a 2.4 series kernel. I went from MRTG 2.10.5 to
> 2.15.2. I went from rrdtool 1.0.XX to rrdtool 1.2.23. I also updated
> perl (I do not remember the old version) to 5.8.8.
>
> These devices share the vendor, Cisco. They are all being run from one
> config file. There are 5973 targets in the config file.
>
I'm assuming you used the same ip address, or that none of the cisco
boxes are filtering your new address. If the new box is unable
administratively to conacted the new boxes, then MRTG would wait for
non-responsive boxes. The default timeouts are pretty high - probably
fine for 56k lines but no good for low-latency enterprises. I run mine
with these timeouts:
::2:1:1:{2,3}
That's try twice, wait 1 second before timing out. I have a mixture of
snmp v2 and v3 devices (mostly v3).
You mention they are all Cisco devices. Note that fwsm, pix, and asa
all require a specific ip address to be polled from, so it could be one
of them bollixing up the works.
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com
________________________________________________________________________
____
Yes, I am using the same IP address.
The current options that I am using are: :::::2.
More information about the mrtg
mailing list