[mrtg] Problem with Bandwidth on nexus 5010 switch

Mersberger, Robert robert.mersberger at goldenliving.com
Wed Jan 6 22:18:20 CET 2010


The configuration below is from chgmaker run against a Nexus 5010 switch where all interfaces should be 10Gb

How do I correct this issue


### Interface 486539264 >> Descr: 'Ethernet1/1' | Name: 'Ethernet1/1' | Ip: '' | Eth: '00-0d-ec-db-0b-c8' ###

Target[nexus1bottom_Ethernet1_1]: #Ethernet1/1:da1sy at nexus1bottom:::::1
SetEnv[nexus1bottom_Ethernet1_1]: MRTG_INT_IP="" MRTG_INT_DESCR="Ethernet1/1"
MaxBytes[nexus1bottom_Ethernet1_1]: 536870911
Title[nexus1bottom_Ethernet1_1]: Traffic Analysis for Ethernet1/1 -- nexus1bottom
PageTop[nexus1bottom_Ethernet1_1]: <h1>Traffic Analysis for Ethernet1/1 -- nexus1bottom</h1>
                <div id="sysdetails">
                        <table>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>System:</td>
                                        <td>nexus1bottom in snmplocation</td>
                                </tr>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>Maintainer:</td>
                                        <td>who at where</td>
                                </tr>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>Description:</td>
                                        <td>Ethernet1/1  </td>
                                </tr>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>ifType:</td>
                                        <td>FastEthernet (100BaseT) (62)</td>
                                </tr>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>ifName:</td>
                                        <td>Ethernet1/1</td>
                                </tr>
                                <tr>
                                        <td>Max Speed:</td>
                                        <td>4295.0 Mbits/s</td>
                                </tr>
                        </table>
                </div>

-----Original Message-----
From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch [mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Alex van den Bogaerdt
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 10:07 AM
To: mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: Re: [mrtg] Fwd: Re: MRTG exact sampling interval

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mustafa Abdel-Hady" <maelhady at eventumsolutions.com>
To: <mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 2:41 PM
Subject: [mrtg] Fwd: Re: MRTG exact sampling interval


> Dear all,
> thanks a lot for your support, I really appreciate that.
> This is a part of a MRTG file:
> 1256555400 357195 556989 552467 561736
> 1256555100 256331 554642 552467 556445
> 1256554800 145589 552803 189183 558581
> 1256554500 162299 554635 169795 556920
> The difference between time stamps here is 5 min, but you can notice that
> there is a big difference between the average and maximum values, which
> may mean that there is a certain resolution that is lower than 5 minutes,
> or in other words, the MRTG can sense peak utilization values in an
> interval which is lower than 5 minutes or it has a polling interval to the
> devices less than 5 minutes.
> Does that make sense?
> And please I want to know this sampling interval.
> Thanks a lot.
> Best Regards,
> Mustafa



It's called normalization.  Not only is the difference 5 minutes, you will
also see that every timestamp is a whole multiple of 5 minutes (300
seconds).

Now consider that you are sampling not at 16:00 and 16:05, 16:10 and so on,
but are sampling at 16:02, 16:07, 16:12 and so on. MRTG (or rather rateup)
will still store it at 16:00, 16:05, 16:10.

If the counter value at 16:02 was 100,000 and the same counter was 103,000
at 16:07, then the rate between 16:02 and 16:07 was
(103,000-100,000)/(16:07-16:02) = 10.

If the rate before 16:02 was zero and the rate after 16:07 was also zero,
then you get the following data:

between 16:00 and 16:02 rate=0
between 16:02 and 16:05 rate=10
between 16:05 and 16:07 rate=10
between 16:07 and 16:10 rate=0

Rateup combines the first two rates:
120 seconds @ 0/second  + 180 seconds @ 10/second = 120*0+180*10 = 1800 per
300 seconds = 6/second.
Rateup combines the last two rates:
120 seconds @ 10/second  + 180 seconds @ 0/second = 120*10+180*0 = 1200 per
300 seconds = 4/second.

Rateup stores:
16:05 average 6 max 10
16:10 average 4 max 10

Now consider the case where 16:07 to 16:12 is not rate 0 but rate 20.
between 16:05 and 16:07 rate=10
between 16:07 and 16:10 rate=20
Rateup combines:
120 seconds @ 10/second  + 180 seconds @ 20/second = 120*10+180*20 = 4800
per 300 seconds = 12/second.

Rateup stores:
16:05 average 6 max 10
16:10 average 12 max 20

Look at the top of your log file. You will see the timestamp MRTG is working
with as well as its input.  Copy those, look 5 minutes later, copy again,
look 5 minutes later, copy again, do the math similar to what I did. It
should match.

_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE:
This e-mail message and any attachment(s)  (collectively,
 this 'Email') are intended only for the confidential use of
the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient named above or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient
named above, you have received this Email in error.
Please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete
this Email and any copies thereof.



More information about the mrtg mailing list