[mrtg] Scaling The Graphs For More Meaningful Results

[Travis Rabe]

That seemed to flatten things out rather than amplify the smaller values.

-----Original Message-----
From: Barber, Erik A. [mailto:Barber.Erik at mayo.edu] 
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:02 PM
To: Travis Rabe; mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: RE: [mrtg] Scaling The Graphs For More Meaningful Results

Unscaled[targetname]: dwmy

http://oss.oetiker.ch/mrtg/doc/mrtg-reference.en.html - search for
"Unscaled"

-----Original Message-----
From: mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch
[mailto:mrtg-bounces at lists.oetiker.ch] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 12:01 PM
To: mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
Subject: [mrtg] Scaling The Graphs For More Meaningful Results

Hello,

I use MRTG on the three interfaces of my firewall.  I have a WAN, DMA
and
LAN.  The WAN interface has a max speed of 1Mbps and while the LAN and
DMA
have a max speed og 100Mbps.  When my T1 is maxed out it would be nice
to
see which interface is using the bandwidth; however, when I look at the
MRTG
graphs for the LAN and the DMZ, they both scale so large that 1Mbs is a
little bump so I cannot determine anything of any value.  My question
is, is
there anyway to scale an interface exponentially or in some other
fashion to
make these more useful when comparing interfaces with different maximum
values?

Thanks,
Travis


_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
mrtg at lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg