[rrd-developers] Problem with recent patch?
Alex van den Bogaerdt
alex at ergens.op.HET.NET
Sat Jul 6 16:30:44 MEST 2002
Hi,
I'm not sure but I think there may be a problem with the recent
patch to allow for PREV(vname).
/* WARNING: if new operators are added, they MUST be added after OP_END.
* This is because COMPUTE (CDEF) DS store OP nodes by number (name is not
* an option due to limited par array size). OP nodes must have the same
* numeric values, otherwise the stored numbers will mean something different. */
enum op_en {OP_NUMBER=0,OP_VARIABLE,OP_INF,OP_PREV,OP_PREV_OTHER,OP_NEGINF,
OP_UNKN,OP_NOW,OP_TIME,OP_ADD,OP_MOD,OP_SUB,OP_MUL,
The OP_PREV_OTHER enumeration is added well before OP_END.
If I understand the warning correctly, all COMPUTE history becomes
invalid if any operator other than number, variable, inf and prev
are used in the RPN string.
cheers,
--
__________________________________________________________________
/ alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl alex at ergens.op.het.net \
| work private |
| My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://faq.mrtg.org/ |
| http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
More information about the rrd-developers
mailing list