[rrd-developers] Re: Problem with current version of rrd_rpncalc.c

[Alex van den Bogaerdt]

Tobias Oetiker wrote:

> yep you are probably right ... things are pretty messy as they are
> now ... feel free to change things ...

Let's first discuss the basic outlines because this is going to have
quite some impact.  Also, I'm not confident *I* can properly setup
the necessary directory, recursive make, automake and so on.

> after all we may still include the c files into 1 big one if needs
> be. freetype does this ...

You mean:  #include "anotherpart.c" ?
I do this often when I'm hacking rrd_graph.  Then I include the
function back into rrd_graph when I'm done.

The benefit of doing it the proper way (compiling separate functions,
not including them) is visible when the program needs to be recompiled
after a change.

cheers,
-- 
   __________________________________________________________________
 / alex at slot.hollandcasino.nl                  alex at ergens.op.het.net \
| work                                                         private |
| My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | 
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://faq.mrtg.org/                                                 |
| http://rrdtool.eu.org  --> tutorial                                  |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+

--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi