[rrd-developers] Re: Cricket issues [was: Future RRD Framework Requirements]

[Jeremy Hinton]

On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Bert Driehuis wrote:

> So, my request to the esteemed readership: if you have issues with
> Cricket, please follow up in cricket-users or cricket-developers (not
> both, please :-)  If you want to develop the kick-ass successor to
> Cricket, please do so -- you'll find that most Cricket developers will
> be happy to support you and probably even change over to your system
> when it's done.

I realize this is the RRD list, and not a cricket list, but...

HEAR HEAR! Cricket has issues, but it does do many things right, and has a
good potential for expandability. Reading through your ideas at your
project site (http://rrfw.sourceforge.net), alot it sounded almost like
ideas for cricket 1.1. jakes view patches are moves in the same direction,
and theres already been discussion of revamping the config tree internals.
If you feel that something new needs to be started, thats understandable,
but i think cricket is an excellent platform to build on.

-jeremy



--
Unsubscribe mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe
Help        mailto:rrd-developers-request at list.ee.ethz.ch?subject=help
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi